Results 1 to 10 of 59
Like Tree113Likes

Thread: Making triple stacked washers old school

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Just a guy with free time.
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Mid state Illinois
    Posts
    1,448
    Thanked: 247

    Default

    I'm really impressed with it. This is something I've been wanting to do for some time. You really did well, and should be proud. I think if you could provide the exact materials and measurements somehow, this thread ought to end up in the wiki. And since you've gone and made a ton....Be expecting a PM from me.

  2. #2
    Senior Member ScienceGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,650
    Thanked: 1342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by regularjoe View Post
    I'm really impressed with it. This is something I've been wanting to do for some time. You really did well, and should be proud. I think if you could provide the exact materials and measurements somehow, this thread ought to end up in the wiki. And since you've gone and made a ton....Be expecting a PM from me.
    The brass was 0.005" thick (I haven't checked an authentic one on a caliper for comparison but it's pretty close.) As far as other measurements, I get the feeling that these weren't standardized much and there's all kinds of patterns, plus they get deformed or flattened easily so original measurements aren't easy. For this project:

    Smaller triple stack die:
    bottom rung diameter: 0.225" (this should have been 0.01 wider but I messed up)
    next: 0.185"
    last: 0.135"
    nib: 0.065"
    depth of each rim: 0.010"
    depth from last rim to die shoulder: 0.065"

    Larger die:
    bottom rung diameter: 0.240"
    next: 0.195"
    last: 0.150"
    nib: 0.065"
    depth of each rim: 0.010"
    depth from last rim to die shoulder: 0.135"

    Just note that these were done on the fly and I didn't measure originals and plan out these measurements from that. For a more comprehensive study or to repro an original one that would be better.
    JBHoren likes this.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to ScienceGuy For This Useful Post:

    Tarkus (01-06-2013)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •