Results 31 to 40 of 107
Thread: Socialism Works!
-
04-14-2009, 12:31 PM #31
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Mountains of Kurdistan (Sweden really)
- Posts
- 348
Thanked: 39I think what the basic problem between the two main opinions that have been shown in this thread is a cultural clash. We basically have two different mentalities about these subjects. And I don't think we will ever come anywhere with this discussion because of these mental or cultural differences.
Anyway I would like to quote the former social democratic prime minister in Sweden who was murdered in 1986 Olof Palme when he is asked by the leader of the opposing center-right leader Thorbjörn Fälldin why he is a socialist.
"I am a democratic socialist, with pride and with joy. I became that when I was in India and saw the terrible poverty, even though some were terribly rich. When I travelled and saw an even more degrading poverty, in a way, in the United States. When I as a very young man and came eye to eye with the lack of freedom and the oppression of communism and its persecution of humans in the communist states. When I came to the Nazi's concentration camps and saw the death rolls of social democrats and labour unionists.
I became that [democratic socialist] when it became clear to me that it was social democracy that was ground breaking for the democracy in Sweden. When it became clear to me that it was social democracy that lifted [Sweden] out of poverty and unemployment with the policy to meet the crisis of the 1930s. [---]
My conviction is confirmed when I look out to the world when I see the wars and the arms race and the mass unemployement and the gaps between people. My conviction is confirmed when in our own country I see the injustices and unemployment increase, speculation and cheating. When I see the rightist policies in country after country drives people into unemployment, smashes the security and still do not solove the economic problems. And when I see the future the [non-socialist parties] have to offer; wage earners shall become poorer and the rich richer. Where the social security becomes weaker and weaker and the luxury boats more. Where the solidarity becomes weaker and egoism stronger. Where the strong can take and the weak have to settle for less.
Sure I am a democratic socialist with pride, over what this democratic socialism has achieved in this country. I am that with joy because I know the important tasks we have before us [---]
It's about solidarity and concern between human beings[...]"
Here is the speech..if you understand Swedish YouTube - Olof Palme därför är jag demokratisk socialist
04-14-2009, 01:05 PM
#32
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Berlin
- Posts
- 1,928
Thanked: 402
A truly great man!
Just wish the SPD in germany would not have been so ruined by people like Schröder or the present great coalition.
I'd so love to resurrect the spirit of Willi Brandt.
Last edited by 0livia; 04-14-2009 at 01:08 PM.
04-14-2009, 02:36 PM
#33
we ARE anarchists, but with a realist view of life. and your comfort is irrelevant.
pure anarchy is a lot of fun, perhaps, but not stable. a little bit of government IS, sadly, necessary. but it's a necessary evil. and hopelessly incompetent.
the reason america has traditionally hated collectivist (and here i mean the political ideology, and not the other definition) political systems is that they are bastions of the weak, yes, but also prisons of the strong.
our great country was founded by strong, confident men. they thought they knew how to run their own lives better than some king far away in britain. so they formed an extremely limited government that allowed them to rule themselves as they thought best.
to me, people who are in favor of socialism must be awfully weak and insecure. how could you think the government can take care of you better than you can take care of yourself unless you well and truly suck at taking care of yourself? i've never understood it. i prefer to have to most freedom possible... to make my own choices, bad or good, and to bear the consequences for them alone. romantic? maybe. arrogant? certainly! but it sure beats the alternative of having society forced to cater to the lowest common denominator.
so flame away. i'm an arrogant american, and i think i know what's best for me better than the UN does, or my own government, or even the mob-ocracy. i just want to freedom to take care of myself.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jockeys For This Useful Post:
Englishgent (04-19-2009), sparq (04-14-2009)
04-14-2009, 03:32 PM
#34
04-14-2009, 03:44 PM
#35
democrats want to rule the boardroom. republicans want to rule the bedroom.
people who truly understand personal liberty don't want to government handing out iron edicts about social OR fiscal issues.
many people view politics on a simple 1-dimensional left-right scale, i think 2 dimensions is more accurate. see the following article for more info:
World's Smallest Political Quiz
04-14-2009, 06:16 PM
#36
04-14-2009, 07:00 PM
#37
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Berlin
- Posts
- 1,928
Thanked: 402
Yes the two were close. Brandt has spent some years in Sweden during or after WWII.
I'm pretty curious which one of the systems will prevail in the present crisis.
Guess it all depends on the heads.
04-14-2009, 10:49 PM
#38
04-14-2009, 11:00 PM
#39
04-15-2009, 12:33 AM
#40
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Mountains of Kurdistan (Sweden really)
- Posts
- 348
Thanked: 39
Canada?! What's so wrong with Canada?
Anyway, the examples you bring up are all communist examples (exept for Nazi germany). And that is a very rudimentary way of looking at the issue. Socialism is not equal to communism. Communism is a (extreme) branch of the wide term 'socialism' but for example social democracy and communism are two different things and they both compete and dislike one another.
This reasoning would be like equalling the american system with Pinochet's chile. It is untrue and unfair. Also the US has at times implemented socialist ideas in the forms of FDR's policies during the depression and also social liberalism. I think the Idea of socialism in america is greatly misunderstood, over-simplified and higly erratic.