Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 77
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Health Insurance in the USA

  1. #1
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default Health Insurance in the USA

    Here is an example of what people in other countries don't have to contend with due to a 'free market' health care system run by Wall Street types. I didn't want this buried in that other thread so here it is for your viewing pleasure. Keep some Kleenex handy if you've to a heart.

    YouTube - Robin Beaton: This Is America And We Deserve Good Health Care
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  • The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JimmyHAD For This Useful Post:

    AussiePostie (08-03-2009), Bigbee (08-03-2009), xman (08-02-2009)

  • #2
    Pogonotomy rules majurey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norf Lahndon, innit?
    Posts
    1,622
    Thanked: 170

    Default

    Such a sad story. To have to pay for your own health and insurance provision is one thing... to have to battle private businesses with their full body of resources dedicated to finding that loophole/error/clause on which to cancel (read: cheat you out of) your treatment despite paying your premiums for years... well, that's why IMO health provision should never be aligned with profit motive.

  • #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by majurey View Post
    that's why IMO health provision should never be aligned with profit motive.
    Why would anyone get into the provision of health care if there was no profit?

    Matt

  • #4
    Super Shaver xman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lotus Land, eh
    Posts
    8,194
    Thanked: 622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    Why would anyone get into the provision of health care if there was no profit?
    uhm ... health? Profit is not the only benefit.

  • #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    131
    Thanked: 9

    Default

    I disagree with taxing people to pay for other peoples health problems, that just encourages people to not care for themselves and just use unhealthy food and addictive stuff because the govt will fix you.
    And medicare in the USA is the same.
    People should be more concered with being able to afford healthcare and not needing it because they look after their health.

    Most people in materialistic society spend most of their money on junk, sad to see this lady was sick, but shes probably like the rest of society spending her money on junk, junk that probably made her sick.

  • #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xman View Post
    uhm ... health? Profit is not the only benefit.
    from each according to their abilities, to each acording to their needs. Right? We don't need money. You work only for the joy of the service you provide, and you don't get paid, right?

  • #7
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    from each according to their abilities, to each acording to their needs. Right? We don't need money. You work only for the joy of the service you provide, and you don't get paid, right?
    Thats only a good idea when its your choice but eventually everyone has to go for that "eeevviiil" profit to support themselves and their endeavors.

  • #8
    Senior Member billyjeff2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    509
    Thanked: 86

    Default

    "sad to see this lady was sick, but shes probably like the rest of society spending her money on junk, junk that probably made her sick."

    If you listen closely to what the lady said--she DID purchase health insurance (Blue Cross). Her treatment was denied because of a prior "acne" diagnosis. Also, to baselessly assert her cancer was caused by her spending money on "junk" is a bit reprehensible, IMO.

  • The Following User Says Thank You to billyjeff2 For This Useful Post:

    JimmyHAD (08-03-2009)

  • #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    131
    Thanked: 9

    Default

    "Also, to baselessly assert her cancer was caused by her spending money on "junk" is a bit reprehensible, IMO. "

    I never said her cancer was caused by that, just probably was caused by it.
    Most cancer is caused by voluntary consumptiuon of toxic materials, the rest which is probably less is caused by involuntary consumption of toxic materials like exhaust fumes.
    Obviously all cancers are going to be a mix of both to some degree but its mainly people putting stuff into their own bodies for many years that causes cancer.

    The reason her treatment was so expensive was becuase she chose the chemotherapy option. Chemotherapy is like offering to fix someones broken leg with a sledgehammer.
    The story is terrible about how the insurance company treated her claim, although the method of treatment and story around how people aquire cancer was what I was commenting on.

  • #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    131
    Thanked: 9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by majurey View Post
    well, that's why IMO health provision should never be aligned with profit motive.
    I agree with this, but you could not just implement it in the healthcare industry it would have to be voluntarily implemented throughout society by all people for this to function correctly. Provision of everything should not be aligned with profit motive.
    Like everyone should receive the best education. And that doesnt just mean whats tought in schools(which is mostly indoctrination), you would need to provide access to the knowledge that rich people of the world know because they have access to better facilities and methods of communication.

    This provison over profit idea is correct, but it would daisy chain right through every service until you would need all services to be "provison over profit". And for that to work everyone would have to quit any use of energy that is wasteful, because that would be the optimum system, and for an optimum system to function you cannot have waste.
    And if everyone was eating super healthy which you would require for this system to function then there would be far less need for healthcare through hospitals and curative medicine, because most things would be prevented...

  • Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •