
Originally Posted by
Pete_S
Yeah, I researched that. They had studies for years that couldn't prove anything about second had smoke, then they had one that might have proven something, and the whole anti-smoking movement ran with it the best they could. I haven't looked in depth at the study, but I have a feeling it was something like they did with marijuana to prove it was harmful-namely force the rat to inhale what would be the human equivalent of several tons at once.
There's a good example of psuedo science for you, alot of these studies to keep drugs like LSD and marijuana illegal.