Results 11 to 20 of 68
Thread: AIR AMERICA DEFUNCT
-
01-24-2010, 04:19 AM #11
Let's just clarify here: what that decision did was allow corporations & unions to spend unlimited amounts of money on campaign ads, where previously, the amount that could be spent was limited. No way can Joe Bloggs hope to compete w/ those monsters. The voice of the individual (as opposed to massive moneyed interests) could well & truly be washed out of the picture here. Sorry, but I fail to see how this is a good thing for democracy.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PA23-250 For This Useful Post:
nun2sharp (01-24-2010), Sirshavesalot (01-24-2010)
-
01-24-2010, 04:45 AM #12
Corporations are made up of people are they not? Just as unions are but under the previous laws the unions had the advantage but now its even.
This is a first amendment issue which states:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to JMS For This Useful Post:
59caddy (01-24-2010)
-
01-24-2010, 05:04 AM #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Stay away stalker!
- Posts
- 4,578
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 1262
-
01-24-2010, 05:11 AM #14
So now both unions and corporations can contribute as much as they want to a political campaign?
I think those of you who are neither in a union or in the management of a sizable corporation got screwed royally. At least you still got your free speech.
Full disclosure: I have become of the opinion that it's not the free speech, but the money that backs it that matters.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to gugi For This Useful Post:
nun2sharp (01-24-2010)
-
01-24-2010, 05:23 AM #15
-
01-24-2010, 05:24 AM #16
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JMS For This Useful Post:
59caddy (01-24-2010), ControlFreak1 (01-24-2010)
-
01-24-2010, 05:29 AM #17
-
01-24-2010, 05:29 AM #18
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- manchester, tn
- Posts
- 938
Thanked: 259
-
01-24-2010, 05:43 AM #19
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- In your attic, waiting for you to leave
- Posts
- 1,189
Thanked: 431
-
01-24-2010, 06:26 AM #20
Bankrupt is right gugi. They are bankrupt because they couldnt make any money doing radio...no one wanted to hear what they were saying, but they started off with tons of money gugi. As far as Scott Brown, I know of him because he managed to take a seat in the senate that has been held by a democrat for 40 + years to represent a state that is 3 or 4 democrats to every 1 republican.
Scott Brown could've had a trillion dollars and had every conservative talk show host back him and he still could not have won that senate seat unless the average citizen was ready for that change.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JMS For This Useful Post:
59caddy (01-24-2010), ControlFreak1 (01-24-2010)