Results 31 to 40 of 106
Thread: Separation of Church and...
-
12-08-2012, 03:48 AM #31
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Frozen Wasteland, eh
- Posts
- 2,806
Thanked: 334
-
12-08-2012, 03:49 AM #32
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Frozen Wasteland, eh
- Posts
- 2,806
Thanked: 334
-
The Following User Says Thank You to mapleleafalumnus For This Useful Post:
maddafinga (12-08-2012)
-
12-08-2012, 03:49 AM #33
That's a good point Glen, and on its face kind of valid, but the Supreme Court has interpreted that saying as there indeed is separation of church and state. More importantly - those decisions have held as interpreted in court. So by all "definition" - there is separation.
It's everywhere in the Constitution - Kind of like the constitution states everyone has the right to bear arms - but convicted felons can't get them... or Canadian students . lol Or voting? Felons can't vote either.
Just saying.David
-
12-08-2012, 03:58 AM #34
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- Guaynabo, Puerto Rico
- Posts
- 383
Thanked: 37Arise, awake, and learn by approaching the exalted ones,
for that path is sharp as a razor’s edge, impassable,
and hard to go by, say the wise. Katha Upanishad – 1.3.14
-
12-08-2012, 04:02 AM #35
LOL - ok so I read the comments on the link. I got a kick out of the person who posted - "it's kind of like this" .
Classic Movie Line #5 - YouTubeDavid
12-08-2012, 04:08 AM
#36
First, please don't put all your faith in grade-school History. "Basic grade school history" as you call it is, necessarily, incredibly simplified. It often perpetuates myths and inaccuracies. For example, do you really think of Columbus as a great man? Ask all the Carib women he raped before writing letters home bragging of the fact. As for his navigational skills, the only reason he stumbled onto what he thought was India was that his math was terrible and he vastly underestimated the diameter of the earth (which, incidentally, every contemporary educated person in Europe recognized was round). Also the thing about him 'discovering' America is bunk. Not only had it been 'discovered' tens of thousands of years earlier and since inhabited by a wide variety of diverse cultures, he was also beaten by about 500 years by the Norse. The "I cannot tell a lie" thing? Also bunk, invented by a later author. Europeans saved and civilized Native Americans (i.e. all aboriginal peoples of the Americas)? Trust me - you *really* don't want to get me started on that one. The point is, as uncomfortable as the notion may be, what any of us learned in grade-school history is most definitely not indisputable fact. This applies to all countries - I have just chosen a few examples from the USA as that's where most folks reading this thread will likely be from.
Second, let's not blame this all on the Roman Catholic church. For all their sins throughout history - and they are many, I think you'll find that many of those who emigrated to North America did so to escape persecution in protestant countries. For example the the settlers of the Plymouth Colony originating from England which was at the time a decidedly non-Catholic realm. No religion has a monopoly on intolerance and hatred. How many of the millions of Spanish and Portuguese fled Europe to escape Catholicism? With the principal exception of the Huguenots, how many fled France because of the Catholic Church? Why were the Americas not dotted with non-Roman Catholic Spanish, Portuguese, and French colonies? Anyway, Catholic countries were dominated by the Catholic church - that is true. But it is also true that Protestant European countries were similarly dominated by their own particular dominant denomination.
Third - what is the evidence for kids being expelled for having a bible or praying? I'm actually genuinely curious about that one as I have always suspected that was either an urban legend or *very* isolated cases that were latched on to by the Christian Right as examples of the so-called 'war on Christianity'. If there are documented cases of this happening, I'd be very interested to read about them. Particularly if they occurred in the same school where other kids are carrying Qur'ans and praying five time a day. And if you want freedom for your kids to express their religion in school, should not that same courtesy be extended to children of other faiths?
It was in original condition, faded red, well-worn, but nice.
This was and still is my favorite combination; beautiful, original, and worn.
-Neil Young
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cangooner For This Useful Post:
earcutter (12-08-2012), maddafinga (12-08-2012), mapleleafalumnus (12-08-2012)
12-08-2012, 04:09 AM
#37
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Maleny, Australia
- Posts
- 7,977
- Blog Entries
- 3
Thanked: 1587
At this point in time I'd simply welcome the separation of Church from small boys. After that we can worry about politics.
James.
<This signature intentionally left blank>
12-08-2012, 04:15 AM
#38
Re: Separation of Church and...
I'd like to add that a nation of vast majority Christian population really can't have a war on Christianity.
My suspicion is that the people complaining of that are actually whining about the loss of their position of special status and privilege, which they are steadily losing.
When the Dude is recognized in the world, unDudeness will be seen everywhere--- the Dude de Ching
12-08-2012, 04:17 AM
#39
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 39
Thanked: 5
Separation of Church and...
Sooooo, If Im Gov of NC and I give my opinion that mint ice cream is nasty and that I prefer orange sherbet, thats technically wrong because now the whole state is somehow "forced" to stand behind my opinion? What if I say as Gov that on the following Sunday I want everyone who agrees with me to have Orange Sherbet ice cream after their sunday meal? oh, heaven forbid I mention Im having mine after a Sunday lunch at CHURCH. Heaven forbid. The only thing that makes this more complicated than ice cream is that religion is such a hot topic. Its actually quite simple if you let it be. This conversation is never going to move forward. You have your opinion, I have mine. I personally believe that christian values in a political figure are nice to have. They are human and subject to corruption like anyone else- they are politicians afterall- but I prefer it. A look at the founding fathers shows that many of them had strong protestant backgrounds and beliefs that they did not hide in their writings or public speakings. Could our government not use a stricter set of morals and guidelines right now? I think we need a whole lot more Jesus than we do insane taxes, corporate backscratching and back room deals. Im cutting off any responses because like I said, its a dead end debate. May God bless you and may your eyes see The Truth before its too late.
12-08-2012, 04:17 AM
#40
The problem is this doesn't quite jive with the history. The early protestants in America were just as intolerant to different religions and variations of their specific religion, as the places they escaped, sometimes even more so.
By the time the constitution of the USA was drawn things had mellowed out a fair amount, and whoremongers and drunkards like Benjamin Franklin got to hold government positions as high as postmaster general