Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 69
Like Tree160Likes

Thread: What's one type of stone you have no interest in?

  1. #51
    Member JaberCrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    36
    Thanked: 5

    Default

    They can be had for cheap. I've found several at flea markets and antique stores for < a sawbuck. None labeled but all Thuris.
    Keep looking.

  2. #52
    Tradesman s0litarys0ldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Sault Sainte Marie
    Posts
    1,719
    Thanked: 245

    Default

    I do not have the time or money right now, besides, they don't tickle my fancy. Kind of like Jnats, Phigs, Zulu Grey's, The Apache stones (all of them), Charnley's, Tam O's, the slates dragon tongue, whatever the other two are and middle range naturals. It's not that they're bad stones, I just have no personal interest in them.
    Last edited by s0litarys0ldier; 11-06-2015 at 03:26 AM.

  3. #53
    Senior Member ultrasoundguy2003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Romulus, Michigan
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanked: 332

    Default

    I started out with a Naniwa 2K and a Combo Coti. Thought I could fix anything with that setup.
    Different steels call for different hones. Most of the important work is done at 1K.
    Finishers do better with different stones.
    I am a hobbyist. A OCD hobbyist just the same.
    If a stone can provide a attribute to my honing I am open to learn.
    If I do 50 x strokes and there is no change to the edge, I change the stone.
    Full synthetics have a place. Naturals after bevel set if I have the time to sip and hone and savor the day.
    Muellers that got pyrite I have no interest in.
    Your only as good as your last hone job.

  4. #54
    illegitimum non carborundum Utopian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    11,544
    Thanked: 3795
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar1953 View Post
    Any stone that wouldn't be considered a finisher.
    I find my bevel setters to be quite handy.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Utopian For This Useful Post:

    ultrasoundguy2003 (11-06-2015)

  6. #55
    Senior Member Oscar1953's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    400
    Thanked: 16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Utopian View Post
    I find my bevel setters to be quite handy.
    I do too but don't find them as interesting to experiment with as finishers.

  7. #56
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    Synthetic and water stones. I was surprised how fast I wore a noticeable amount off my Norton stone. And there have been other (user error) hiccups with water stones.

    If I ever get the money freed up to where I can, I'd like to switch to an Arkansas/oil setup.

  8. #57
    Tradesman s0litarys0ldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Sault Sainte Marie
    Posts
    1,719
    Thanked: 245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal View Post
    Synthetic and water stones. I was surprised how fast I wore a noticeable amount off my Norton stone. And there have been other (user error) hiccups with water stones.

    If I ever get the money freed up to where I can, I'd like to switch to an Arkansas/oil setup.
    DaveW does an all ark progression video on YouTube. It's really cool to watch. Totally doable.
    Steel likes this.

  9. #58
    Senior Member blabbermouth Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,321
    Thanked: 498

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal View Post
    Synthetic and water stones. I was surprised how fast I wore a noticeable amount off my Norton stone. And there have been other (user error) hiccups with water stones.

    If I ever get the money freed up to where I can, I'd like to switch to an Arkansas/oil setup.
    I have been working exclusively with Arkansas stones for a little while and although they are a very difficult system to master it is totally worth it in my opinion. The edges are stunning. As mentioned by solitary, Dave W. Is very knowledgable about The "Arkenstones" and a great resource.
    Last edited by Steel; 11-09-2015 at 09:07 AM.
    What a curse be a dull razor; what a prideful comfort a sharp one

  10. #59
    Senior Member Vasilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    885
    Thanked: 202

    Default

    Am I the only one who finds the Arkansas stones painfully slow? Sure, that's the reason they last longer, but for an edge that's no longer sharp or a bit serious metal removal, they would be my last option, and they are advertised a LOT. I'm 100% sure both US and Canada have plenty of other types of quality stones.
    For the coarse grits there are plenty of good sandstones that are faster, for intermediate, both sandstones, slates or other types that don't belong to any of these two famous categories, and for finishers, we know about a lot of good stones including the finishing Arkansas that I agree are good stones.

  11. #60
    Tradesman s0litarys0ldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Sault Sainte Marie
    Posts
    1,719
    Thanked: 245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vasilis View Post
    Am I the only one who finds the Arkansas stones painfully slow? Sure, that's the reason they last longer, but for an edge that's no longer sharp or a bit serious metal removal, they would be my last option, and they are advertised a LOT. I'm 100% sure both US and Canada have plenty of other types of quality stones.
    For the coarse grits there are plenty of good sandstones that are faster, for intermediate, both sandstones, slates or other types that don't belong to any of these two famous categories, and for finishers, we know about a lot of good stones including the finishing Arkansas that I agree are good stones.
    No I'll agree I find them slow, but that is a subjective thing isn't it. Most naturals are "slow" when compared to synthetics and even some naturals are really slow when compared to each other.. An example, I used to own a bbw that left an amazing polish and shaving edge. It took 3x longer then using a coticule and 5x longer then using water stones.
    Vasilis likes this.

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •