Results 11 to 20 of 90
Thread: Apple's stand against the Feds
-
02-19-2016, 02:53 AM #11
-
02-19-2016, 03:00 AM #12
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Location
- Virginia
- Posts
- 1,516
Thanked: 237That's the thing, the attack already happened, so they aren't preventing anything. They would be opening up an entirely new platform for terrorism to occur. How would you feel if you stopped one attack, but the means used to do so led to hundreds of more attacks that wouldn't have happened.
I'm a United States Marine, so yes, I've lost family to terrorists. I despise the tactics they use. I wish it was possible to wipe them all out in one go. The problem is that isn't possible. Terrorists are people, with families and friends. For every one you kill, you create a dozen more seeking revenge...
-
02-19-2016, 03:06 AM #13
A what if question. If Mr. Cooks son daughter or grand child was held by kid nappers and the kidnappers lost there apple phone in the process. I wonder how quick Mr. Cook would create a back door. The US is suppose to be a nation of laws. If the police went through the correct process in obtaining the the legal order then Mr. Cook should comply. again just my opinion. When the very rich or political elite thumb there noises at the legal system they should be held accountable. again just my opinion.
-
02-19-2016, 03:10 AM #14
-
02-19-2016, 03:11 AM #15
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada
- Posts
- 14,441
Thanked: 4827As I read through the post by Tim Cook, part of the rational used is that by creating a solid back door it leaves a point for hacking as well. It is not as simple as to just them having access. I would think that it will take more consideration than just about the FBI having access. If it was simply the FBI and there was some guarantee that it would be absolutely only the law authorities in our country that could exercise this access, they can have it. As for it being a security risk, that is where I get a little apprehensive.
It's not what you know, it's who you take fishing!
-
The Following User Says Thank You to RezDog For This Useful Post:
Steel (02-19-2016)
-
02-19-2016, 03:11 AM #16
Completely ridiculous that anyone in our government can demand a company that is ran by someone other than the government and had nothing to do with the crime to do anything. They simply sold a phone to a cell phone provider, that sold it to a individual. If the FBI can't break into a phone, maybe they should look at hiring some new folks. Slippery slope to say the least. All bad IMO. Even more so if the criminals were alive. They should also work on hiring the right amount of people. They are terribly undermanned and the government doesn't seem to be doing anything about it. They want want want when its convenient but god forbid they do anything in a timely manner that helps the country.
You guys talk about the all mighty dollar... take a look at your government before we talk about others and money.
-
02-19-2016, 03:12 AM #17
-
02-19-2016, 03:12 AM #18
-
02-19-2016, 03:16 AM #19
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Location
- Virginia
- Posts
- 1,516
Thanked: 237
-
02-19-2016, 03:17 AM #20
Your off topic with the opening post,,,,,