Results 21 to 30 of 71
Thread: Our fearless leader...
-
10-09-2009, 06:38 PM #21
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 2,516
Thanked: 369
-
10-09-2009, 07:07 PM #22
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Mouzon, France
- Posts
- 507
Thanked: 116Well, the peace prize has been a joke for more than a century anyways...
Roosevelt in 1905, after the suppression of a revolt in the Philippines
Hull in 1945, after the SS St Louis crisis
Kissinger in 1973, while bombing Cambodia and during Operation Condor
Sadat in 1978, after the Yom Kippur war
Arafat in 1984
-
10-09-2009, 09:23 PM #23
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- manchester, tn
- Posts
- 938
Thanked: 259just more dumbing down of america and the rest of the world i am afraid to see where we are gonna be 30 or 40 years from now. i am glad in a way that i will not be here to see how disgraced we will probably be. sad but true
-
10-09-2009, 09:51 PM #24
Please tell when was the last year that the Nobel Prize got to the right address and who got it?
To me it was as big surprise Obama got the prize after so short time, but the committee had sensible reasons.
You boys there should be proud of your president and also for getting the prize to U.S.A or is so that everything Obama does is wrong?'That is what i do. I drink and i know things'
-Tyrion Lannister.
-
10-09-2009, 10:23 PM #25
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Fayetteville, GA
- Posts
- 227
Thanked: 20Not so much that everything he does is wrong, it's just that none of the reasons stated have come to fruition.
Tom Daschell told Obama more than two years ago that if he wanted to run for president, he needed to run before the voters found out much about him. I guess the NNC felt the same way.
I have read the responses that many U.S. citizens have made today upon hearing the news. Almost without exception their response has been, "For what?"
I agree, under the circumstances it would have been more honorable for Obama to have declined the award. Just imagine how upset the liberals would have felt if George W. had won the Nobel Peace Prize just eight months into his administration.
This has really put Obama in an impossible situation. He cannot now send more troupes to Afghanistan and he cannot win the war in Afghanistan if he doesn't and if we don't win, the Tali-ban will bring Al Qaeda back in and let them set up shop again. Remember, America is not the only country that has been the subject of terrorist attacks by extremist Muslim groups. We just haven't been targeted while we were flexing our muscles and showing Al Qaeda that there is or was a price to pay for attacking the U.S.
-
10-09-2009, 10:46 PM #26
I can't help but roll my eyes every time I see someone who's against Obama's "politics" type out his name in full. Barack Hussein Obama. Yeah, I realize it's his given name, but the fact he doesn't commonly use all three himself (and nor do others in his political circle or in the media - aside from maybe Fox News) means you're saying it as a put-down. It's not subtle or clever - it just jumps right out as a flashing "ignorant" sign.
And yeah, the guy hasn't done squat to deserve a Nobel Peace Prize, by the way.
-
10-09-2009, 11:07 PM #27
There is more than meets the eye here.
When someone wins something you usually say congratulations. A well respected tribunal has made this decision not a couple of guys in a bar.
This is just another situation demonstrating the hatred and vitriol so many in this country feel for our president. Its just another symtom that people in this country are becoming more and more polarized. Its either my way or the highway.
This country isn't in big troubel its in very big trouble.No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero
-
The Following User Says Thank You to thebigspendur For This Useful Post:
Sailor (10-10-2009)
-
10-09-2009, 11:11 PM #28
-
10-09-2009, 11:59 PM #29
-
10-10-2009, 01:01 AM #30
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Englishgent For This Useful Post:
59caddy (10-10-2009)