Thread: Whats your opinion on automatic weapons?

Originally Posted by Jimbo

Remind me not to accept a pig roast invitation from you Wullie

James.

Wouldn't matter, you have to be pretty quick around here to beat the "Mexican" Buzzards (YES, I'm referring to a real vulture, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Vulture). Those damn things have invaded and they are quick to a kill.

Originally Posted by HNSB

That entire article is based on the flawed premise that the sole purpose of an "assault weapon" is to kill people.
If you buy into that premise, I suppose it does make sense.

Exactly, and that's the same reason I can't get a Thermo Nuclear device. All this nonsense and trash talk about 'weapons of mass destruction" What twit even coined that phrase? I just want something to put on display in my basement until I can afford an old obsolete ICBM to attach it to. No, they won't let me have that either.

Originally Posted by shamrocker

I didn't have time to read all the reply's, so maybe someone else has touched on this......I believe of all 3 of the firearms he was packing, the shotgun was the most deadly. I truly enjoy my full-autos, and it has been the best investment vs. return on my money for years now. That said they would be way down on my list if I were out to do mayhem. The shotgun would be my first. In my world this is a "rights" thing, and my "rights" come from my creator. I will not infringe on yours, do not even think of infringing on mine. We can have differing opinions on many or all subjects and thankfully we have the right and freedom to express same. As far as my attempting to remove some, all or even any of your rights, not going to happen. Ditto the reverse.

That's another thing. They won't let me get a Street Sweeper and I want one. Why if I had one I could go down to the Prairie Dog City and take care of those pesky critters once and for all.

Originally Posted by gssixgun

hehehe I promise it wasn't "B" Firefighter2 deleted his own post, and changed the count

Ha, ha! Sorry guys, it was me. But I didn't do it to change the count, & I didn't try to steal the 1000th post! (Although now I kinda' wish I did!)
P.S. Thanks GSSIXGUN for ratting me out! LOL

If we outlawed bad people, there would be no crimes

Originally Posted by unit

If we outlawed bad people, there would be no crimes

If we outlawed crimes there'd be no bad people!



James.

Originally Posted by Jimbo

If we outlawed crimes there'd be no bad people!



James.

Making crimes illegal?....interesting...tell me more about this idea...

Seems to me, IIRC the original wording of the so call assault weapon ban stated that ANY firearm ever issued to any military and capable of having a bayonet attached was classified as an assault weapon.

This qualified.


As did just about every other manually operated rifle ever issued.

Dangerous! EVIL! NASTY!!
pbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbt.

Well you see, if nothing were illegal no one would break laws and hence there would be no "bad" people.

James.

Originally Posted by Wullie

Seems to me, IIRC the original wording of the so call assault weapon ban stated that ANY firearm ever issued to any military and capable of having a bayonet attached was classified as an assault weapon.

This qualified.


As did just about every other manually operated rifle ever issued.

Dangerous! EVIL! NASTY!!
pbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbt.

Hey, I saw that movie about Davy Crockett at the Alamo and I saw him swinging that musket and killing those invaders by the score. He didn't even need no bullets.