Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 61
Like Tree62Likes

Thread: Germany's top court says army can use weapons on German streets in extreme situations

  1. #11
    lobeless earcutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    4,864
    Thanked: 762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mapleleafalumnus View Post
    The Richard Riot in Montreal back in the late 1950s when Clarence Campbell suspended The Rocket for the duration of the season plus the playoffs!
    Back on topic: the last thing I could call a German riot that I recall was November 1989 when the Berlin Wall came down...but I don't think I would call that a riot, more of a celebration!
    So maybe Joed has a valid question! What are the Germans prepping for?

    I didn't know Germany couldn't use arms on their own people! What a great and awesome thing to have as law!! It's too bad they are amending that!
    David

  2. #12
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Frozen Wasteland, eh
    Posts
    2,806
    Thanked: 334

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by earcutter View Post
    So maybe Joed has a valid question! What are the Germans prepping for?

    I didn't know Germany couldn't use arms on their own people! What a great and awesome thing to have as law!! It's too bad they are amending that!
    Like I posted, welcome to the new Star Court.

  3. #13
    Damn hedgehog Sailor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    SW Finland
    Posts
    3,081
    Thanked: 1806

    Default

    I do not know about Germany but it might be just a simple thing, really.'

    Up here the armed forces have a rules, based on levels of using the force. Level zero (just like any civilian) to level nnnn.

    Not so many years ago some politician surprisingly realized that even if we had a level 'highest', it would be illegal to carry loaded hand gun or rifle when doing service outside bases. It means that even level high it would be ok to crush someone's house with a tank or cannon but still not use a hand gun or rifle.

    Of course the laws changed quickly. I'd like to think it is the same with Germany.

    No conspiracies. Although there are so many negative news about union today, i'd like to think it still goes ok and about 90% of all Europeans supporting it. This is based on my own experiences.
    Small minorities like right wingers are just what they are: small minorities, but they are good in making big noise. Even they can't stop the wheel from turning, specially when majority of the people do support it.
    Back here those right wing nut parties are commonly called (even in the news) as 'true asses'.
    Last edited by Sailor; 08-17-2012 at 08:24 PM.
    Joed and earcutter like this.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Sailor For This Useful Post:

    mapleleafalumnus (08-17-2012)

  5. #14
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    17,293
    Thanked: 3223

    Default

    Not anything to get excited about, they are just modifying their constitution to be in line with what other countries have. The post war constitution put a lot of restrictions in place that other independent countries do not have. When Trudeau declared the war measures act in Canada during the FLQ crisis the army turned out in Quebec with loaded guns. If Germany had not altered their constitution they would not be able to do what Trudeau did in October of 1970. They are over 40 years late catching up with the rest of us.

    Bob

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to BobH For This Useful Post:

    Sailor (08-18-2012)

  7. #15
    There is no charge for Awesomeness Jimbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Maleny, Australia
    Posts
    7,977
    Thanked: 1587
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    I'd wager the thing Germany is preparing for is more crappy, fear-driven politics. There's probably an election looming...

    Now if they'd passed a law so that the army can use weapons on people who think the way to control the population is through fear and misinformation, maybe they'd be onto a winner!

    James.
    <This signature intentionally left blank>

  8. #16
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,025
    Thanked: 13245
    Blog Entries
    1

    Cool

    This worries me more




    Wednesday, August 15, 2012

    First it was the Department of Homeland Security, then it was the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and now the Social Security Administration is set to purchase 174,000 rounds of hollow point bullets that will be delivered to 41 locations across the country.



    A solicitation posted by the SSA on the FedBizOpps website asks for contractors to supply 174,000 rounds of “.357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow point pistol ammunition.”

    An online ammunition retailer describes the bullets as suitable “for peak performance rivaling and sometimes surpassing handloads in many guns,” noting that the ammo is “a great personal defense bullet.”

    The synopsis to the solicitation adds that the ammunition is to be shipped to 41 locations within 60 days of purchase. A separate spreadsheet lists those locations, which include the Social Security headquarters in Baltimore, Maryland as well as major cities across the country including Los Angeles, Detroit, Oklahoma City, Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, Denver, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Seattle.

    Hollow point bullets are designed to expand as they enter the body, causing maximum damage by tearing apart internal organs.


    Zombie Old Farts ?????


    and this


    Wednesday, August 15, 2012



    The Department of Homeland Security has redacted information relating to the quantity of bullets it is buying following a controversy concerning the agency’s purchase of over a billion rounds of ammo, which many fear is a sign the federal government is preparing for civil unrest in the United States.



    Despite the fact that documents are only supposed to be redacted if authorized by Congress or for national security reasons, a solicitation posted on the FedBizOpps website yesterday concerning ammunition purchases made by the DHS on behalf of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) contains numerous blacked out sections.

    The classified portions of the document include references to the amount of 223 62 and 223 64 grain ammunition being purchased.

    The solicitation explains how the contract put out by the DHS to purchase the ammunition was not subject to “full and open competition,” a process justified by what the DHS claims was an “unusual and compelling urgency” to acquire the bullets, noting that there is a shortage of bullets which is threatening a situation which could cause “substantial safety issues for the government” should law enforcement officials not be adequately armed.

    The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to black out sections of the document, including the number of bullets being purchased, is likely to be related to a massive controversy which has snowballed over the last few weeks pertaining to concerns as to why the federal agency has purchased well over a billion rounds of bullets over the last 6 months alone.

    The DHS’ decision back in March to purchase of 450 million rounds of .40-caliber hollow point bullets that are designed to expand upon entry and cause maximum organ damage prompted questions as to why the federal agency required such powerful bullets and in such large quantities merely for training purposes.

    This was followed up by a more recent order for a further 750 million rounds of assorted ammunition, including bullets that can penetrate walls.

    Given the fact that the DHS is also acquiring riot gear in preparation for civil unrest which could take place at the upcoming DNC, RNC and presidential inauguration, the purchase of ammunition in such massive numbers has stoked fears that the federal government could be preparing to use force against the American people.


    Zombie Voters ????
    Last edited by gssixgun; 08-17-2012 at 10:00 PM.
    Joed likes this.

  9. #17
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    All I want to know is if they come and "disappear" Joed in the middle of the night .... or whenever ..... can I have his razors ???
    Joed, Hirlau, alb1981 and 2 others like this.

  10. #18
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Frozen Wasteland, eh
    Posts
    2,806
    Thanked: 334

    Default

    Glen --
    Do I smell another "sell guns in Mexico" cabal brewing? Are the DHS, SSA and NOAA so fearful of the citizenry??? Whatever happened to "transparency in gov't.?

  11. #19
    lobeless earcutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    4,864
    Thanked: 762

    Default

    Call me dumb, but I am not too sure I understand your concerns Glen. American governmental agency's buying large amounts of ammo isn't anything new... is it?
    David

  12. #20
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,025
    Thanked: 13245
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by earcutter View Post
    Call me dumb, but I am not too sure I understand your concerns Glen. American governmental agency's buying large amounts of ammo isn't anything new... is it?
    Actually I don't know it could be normal, and it is just that we have more access to more info now-a-days

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •