Thread: Are you "Furious".

You've got to read the other justices too.

Where can I find them?
They are not on the Supreme Court's website yet; Google just gives me a bunch of news articles with short excerpts.

Roberts' was easy enough to find. I would like to read the rest.

No, they're all there, just keep reading: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions...11-393c3a2.pdf

Originally Posted by HNSB

What specifically about the act leads you to that conclusion?

Will never be enough funds in the forced insurance pool to provide for state of the art services for 30 million more patients,Who will be the sickest of the sick.

Originally Posted by 1OldGI

Wait until next week when the Supreme Court rules in favor of 70% of Americans and kills Obamacare. And November? Forget about it, I for one am spiking football early and often.

Hide and watch what happens. The Supreme Court is bought and paid for. The Holder thing won't be enforced. The keys to the ballot box are secured. Illegal activity is ignored and rewarded. It really is obvious what is happening. The Tree of Liberty needs feeding. JMHO

Originally Posted by HNSB

Can someone give me a cliff's notes version of what specifically about the act you like or don't like.
Maybe I can't read between the lines well, but it seems like people on both sides think the act does things that, from my understanding, it doesn't do.
What am I missing?

Why is no one concerned about Chief Justice Roberts' opinion as it relates to taxation as a means to bypass the limitations of the commerce clause?
Why is no one concerned about what will happen when the party opposite of them is in power?

If you haven't done so, and you get a chance, you should read Justice Roberts' opinion. I think a lot of people that are currently doing a "happy dance" might not be so happy any more, and I think those that are sulking will be briefly entertained, but should also be very concerned.
Most of the comments I've read in various places on the internet, regarding the decision have focused on the act (and probably rightfully so) but there are many other things to discuss - things that could potentially have a far bigger impact than an act that, from what I can tell, doesn't do as much as people think it does.

Here's just ONE of the things you might be missing.
ObamaCare Flatlines: ObamaCare Taxes Home Sales - Clobbers Middle-Class Americans - Blog - GOP.gov

OH, it has absolutely nothing to do with health care.

Another thing I find interesting about this whole bag of poop is that if it was never INTENDED to be a tax, then WHY is the IRS ordained to administer it and collect the monies?

That article uses the word "could" a lot. Considering it comes from an opposition source, it stands to reason that "could" may refer to a small fraction of a percentage, or even an unlikely though technically possible scenario.
I would like to see specifics of who / how many people selling homes would be affected.

Another thing I find interesting about this whole bag of poop is that if it was never INTENDED to be a tax, then WHY is the IRS ordained to administer it and collect the monies?

The supreme court made it very clear that it IS a tax.
I guess Obama lied about that.
Go figure.

Originally Posted by HNSB

The supreme court made it very clear that it IS a tax.
I guess Obama lied about that.
Go figure.

You're a bit behind, perhaps because you're following the wrong sources. Next time you may want to check with the fair and balanced news first:

You GUESS Barry lied?

No guessing to it.
Obama: Mandate is Not a Tax - ABC News

And you're not going to hear much against the bill from anyone but the opposition.

The Dems were so happy that they "tweeted" then removed the "tweets" directed at anyone not on their bus about the ruling.
Dem. Leaders Taunt GOP Over Obamacare Ruling – Obscenities On Twitter

John Roberts is a genius. These two Washington Post articles sums it up. In short, Roberts told the Fed that they cannot require the public to participate in anything that the Fed mandates on them via the "Commerce Clause".

http://mobile.washingtonpost.com/rss...&cid=791&spf=1

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...Y9V_story.html

Originally Posted by Wullie

You GUESS Barry lied?

Deadpan doesn't work well with written language.

He lied as if he was George Bush the 3rd, or something.
Better?