Thread: Pondering......

Originally Posted by straightrazorheaven

The only difference between a Citizen per se, and a subject is "who rules". The rules and crap that come along with it are all the same.
From what you believe is a subject, what is so wrong about becoming so? Wouldn't you rather KNOW that if you wanted a change of government, it would happen by word of mouth, not action of fist. Look at the middle east, where needed the rest of the world (including where citizens are unarmed) provide help to break the government. Yes, in those cases violence was needed. It is important to note that the rest of the world is helping, and providing weapons. They didn't need to own them before the revolt.


You really don't understand do you, no matter how we explain it The Bill of Rights is just beyond your comprehension,,, Must be a cultural difference

I have been thinking about this whole discussion since Friday. My reason for wanting a firearm free USA, is because I don't believe allowing citizens the right to carry a potentially deadly weapon is sending the right message. It doesn't really matter that much to me what it is used for, the fact that they are around doesn't instil confidence. Allowing citizens to carry is sending the message "it is OK to use deadly force if needed". Whether or not people think this right, that is the whole reason I believe the amendment needs to be rescinded. The world is a very different place now, the dangers less severe.


And there is the cultural difference pointed out for all to see,,,As Americans we do reserve the right to use Deadly Force, it really is just that simple isn't it,

Thank you for being so upfront about how you feel, here we call it "The Victim Mentality" or "Sheeple" not for me, no matter how you try and package it